We held an intriguing and thought-provoking debate over the issue of censorship during lesson last week. I believe we had covered considerable ground as a team - Nicholas, Gerald, Jason, Esther, Michael, Yueh Phing, myself, and also as a class on the whole.
On my previous post, I had addressed the issue of censorship, whether it could be justified. The conclusion I drew was that censorship ought to be given an approving nod, so long as its influence is not abused by its users. Our group came up with solid examples of why censorship should be established; the negative aspects and morality issues of movies or even songs nowadays are simply too much. From Madonna's works to the cinematic scene of Korea, rages rampant and unchecked sexual behaviours and vulgarities. Already, the teens are getting out of hand. Are we not aggravating the situation if we leave these negative influences alone? Do we want to see our next generation having such unruly behaviours, or a group of people so used to hearing swear-words uttered - be it on television or the radio, that they themselves are infusing vulgarities in their everyday conservations?
It just brings us back to point number one, which is censorship cannot be done away with. So long as it possesses validity, there is no reason why we should abandon it.
Thursday, May 17, 2007
Censorship can never be justified. Do you agree?
It rather depends on how you define censorship and justified. Censorship yes, but to what degree? Justifiable, again, to what extent?
There is no denying that censorship has positive effects. It filters the possible bad influences from us, say, extreme gore in movies and television programs. It prevents our kids from being overly exposed to unruly, 'loose' sexual references and behaviour. In short, it helps to shield us from the negative 'aura' that the media exudes, and protects our children.
But people do feel otherwise. Censorship restricts us; what we see, hear, listen to. It smothers freedom. Most importantly, it is antagonistic to the idea of freedom of speech and democracy that so many countries are pushing for. Some governments too recognise censorship as a tool to block out its opposing voices. This is but an example of the many instances where censorship is abused.
Do we do away with it? I think not. It is beneficial, like it or not. It is essential. Freedom of speech should be adopted and practised. But when it gets out of hand, which it usually does, censorship is the buffer we rely on to prevent unrest in our communities.
There is no denying that censorship has positive effects. It filters the possible bad influences from us, say, extreme gore in movies and television programs. It prevents our kids from being overly exposed to unruly, 'loose' sexual references and behaviour. In short, it helps to shield us from the negative 'aura' that the media exudes, and protects our children.
But people do feel otherwise. Censorship restricts us; what we see, hear, listen to. It smothers freedom. Most importantly, it is antagonistic to the idea of freedom of speech and democracy that so many countries are pushing for. Some governments too recognise censorship as a tool to block out its opposing voices. This is but an example of the many instances where censorship is abused.
Do we do away with it? I think not. It is beneficial, like it or not. It is essential. Freedom of speech should be adopted and practised. But when it gets out of hand, which it usually does, censorship is the buffer we rely on to prevent unrest in our communities.
Tuesday, May 8, 2007
The Media is corrupting our society. Do you agree?
The media's priority would be its ratings; that is a known and undeniable fact. As long as this biting truth is here to stay, corruption in the media will be inevitable.
Just how many times have we witnessed the media's unscrupulous acts? To bring up the diving viewer ratings, some celebrities' ugly 'undergarments' are dug out and left in the street; while facts are distorted to suit the media's needs. In view of the general attitude and perceptions of the population, the media is taking stands. The media would sometimes favor this person, this organization, this community, if it means higher ratings for themselves.
The severe complication of this issue, would be that the media's influence stretches right to our doorsteps. The hotspot, television, is the source of entertainment and sorts for which most people in the world cannot do without. That will conveniently mean the source of 'filth' and corruption is deposited right in our living rooms, with our children paying more attention to it than our concern and 'nagging'. It is no wonder, due to the media's negative influence, that recent events such as the Virginia Tech shooting occurred.
It is also true that the media still possesses a shred, however small, of its true purpose - to bring accurate and unbiased information to the public. Therefore, I believe that we should do all we can in our power, to stem the conflicting and 'harming' values of the media, before it swallows the media whole. And us too, for that matter.
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/150207.php
Just how many times have we witnessed the media's unscrupulous acts? To bring up the diving viewer ratings, some celebrities' ugly 'undergarments' are dug out and left in the street; while facts are distorted to suit the media's needs. In view of the general attitude and perceptions of the population, the media is taking stands. The media would sometimes favor this person, this organization, this community, if it means higher ratings for themselves.
The severe complication of this issue, would be that the media's influence stretches right to our doorsteps. The hotspot, television, is the source of entertainment and sorts for which most people in the world cannot do without. That will conveniently mean the source of 'filth' and corruption is deposited right in our living rooms, with our children paying more attention to it than our concern and 'nagging'. It is no wonder, due to the media's negative influence, that recent events such as the Virginia Tech shooting occurred.
It is also true that the media still possesses a shred, however small, of its true purpose - to bring accurate and unbiased information to the public. Therefore, I believe that we should do all we can in our power, to stem the conflicting and 'harming' values of the media, before it swallows the media whole. And us too, for that matter.
http://blogcritics.org/archives/2004/09/27/150207.php
Thursday, May 3, 2007
Virginia Tech Shooting
I was pretty shocked myself after coming across this incident in the newspapers recently. 34 people losing their lives for no apparent reason in such a short span of say, a quarter of an hour? You would say impossible. But the impossible has nonetheless happened.
This tragedy has sparked off heated discussions, debates, all sorts. Besides wanting to make sense of the bloodbath and the underlying reason to the South Korean's seeming bitterness, people have also brought up the issue of the sale of guns in the US. True, self defence and safety is of priority. However, we must also consider what implications it might hold. What's with the media pushing for more action packed movies and 'unintended' gore, with 'heroes' unleashing pop guns for the most part, coupled with the ease of purchasing weaponry in the States, it will be no wonder if someone did a Virginia Tech again.
Cho Seung Hui has undoubtedly carved his name unto the annals of history; his rampage has earned itself the title of the worst school massacre in US history. It was known that his rage was fueled by him being ''spurned by a would-be girlfriend, not to mention his eccentric temperament. Now, doesnt that remind us of similar beings, like the EMO kids? They probably share the same problems and dilemma of the gunman, perhaps not to such an extreme. But there is no knowing what the EMO kids will turn out to be in the future. Another Cho Seung Hui, if their predicament aggravates? I certainly hope not.
This tragedy has sparked off heated discussions, debates, all sorts. Besides wanting to make sense of the bloodbath and the underlying reason to the South Korean's seeming bitterness, people have also brought up the issue of the sale of guns in the US. True, self defence and safety is of priority. However, we must also consider what implications it might hold. What's with the media pushing for more action packed movies and 'unintended' gore, with 'heroes' unleashing pop guns for the most part, coupled with the ease of purchasing weaponry in the States, it will be no wonder if someone did a Virginia Tech again.
Cho Seung Hui has undoubtedly carved his name unto the annals of history; his rampage has earned itself the title of the worst school massacre in US history. It was known that his rage was fueled by him being ''spurned by a would-be girlfriend, not to mention his eccentric temperament. Now, doesnt that remind us of similar beings, like the EMO kids? They probably share the same problems and dilemma of the gunman, perhaps not to such an extreme. But there is no knowing what the EMO kids will turn out to be in the future. Another Cho Seung Hui, if their predicament aggravates? I certainly hope not.
Wednesday, April 25, 2007
Nowadays, the mass media do not report the news; they make the news.
True, no? you're a journalist, a person equipped with a deadly weapon; a license to publish the ugly truths, revolting facts and persistingly irritating figures. you can ruin this person's life, and make the other guy champion of the world. Impressive? i would say intimidating. yes.
but she calls the shots in the media field, yours anyway. she compliments, complains, frowns, shouts, but she provides the dough. and she tells you (straight in the face) that the media's ratings are taking a plunge. you look at your hands, with what's happening in the world today; a ninety seven year old diehard managing to conquer, say, a hill? am i really going to count on this to make my day, or keep my rice bowl for that matter. or can i do better?
you're not that intimidating now, are you?
Like in any other job domain, the whole idea of commercialising, money-making and profit priority is settling, like it or not, into the media world. Money is what counts. The media wants for itself high ratings, which would simply translate into more profits. This brings us back to, well, MONEY. The thick wad of bills. Who cares whether or not the information is true, the crowd loves it! i process this news i found out; give it a little twist, turn and a right smack on the ass. then blow it up, and there we go! the readers are captivated! enthralled! so eager for more!
But before we go pointing fingers, we must always start on ourselves. I believe that we should start paying our dear journalists more attention. We should embolden this message as a community, society, country, world. that we respect the freedom of the press and media, but our news will not be compromised. It MUST not be compromised.
but she calls the shots in the media field, yours anyway. she compliments, complains, frowns, shouts, but she provides the dough. and she tells you (straight in the face) that the media's ratings are taking a plunge. you look at your hands, with what's happening in the world today; a ninety seven year old diehard managing to conquer, say, a hill? am i really going to count on this to make my day, or keep my rice bowl for that matter. or can i do better?
you're not that intimidating now, are you?
Like in any other job domain, the whole idea of commercialising, money-making and profit priority is settling, like it or not, into the media world. Money is what counts. The media wants for itself high ratings, which would simply translate into more profits. This brings us back to, well, MONEY. The thick wad of bills. Who cares whether or not the information is true, the crowd loves it! i process this news i found out; give it a little twist, turn and a right smack on the ass. then blow it up, and there we go! the readers are captivated! enthralled! so eager for more!
But before we go pointing fingers, we must always start on ourselves. I believe that we should start paying our dear journalists more attention. We should embolden this message as a community, society, country, world. that we respect the freedom of the press and media, but our news will not be compromised. It MUST not be compromised.
Tuesday, April 3, 2007
Hope is the gay, skylarking pajamas we wear over yesterday's bruises
This phrase by Benjamin De Casseres, effectively lured me into the deep, unpredictable pit of thought. Indeed, the reason we are able to put up with and endure the blows and beatings of yesterday, would boil down to the hope of seeing a better tomorrow. Would you then not agree that hope is the driving mechanism in our lives, the root of our enthusiasm and optimism? Who are we without hope? And what is hope without us?
YOUTUBE!
No doubt youtube is going to be an essentiality for time to come; its swarming pool of knowledge, innovation and discoveries are too significant to be cast aside. I would stifle the urge to laugh whenever i think of a video i once viewed on youtube. It illustrated the actual ignorance of the citizens of a world superpower, America. While the country is commended for its frequent breakthroughs in the field of science and technology, her citizens are still unsure of the number of sides of a triangle. Irony yes.
People also do comment that this technological asset can be nonsensical and a bane at times. This view is wholeheartedly supported by frequent posts of worthless and meaningless videos and documents, which unfortunate to say, take up the majority of the content at times. However, before we delve too much into the unfavourable aspects of youtube, let us focus instead on its helpfulness and benefits. You would then agree that reaping the advantages of this tool would and will be, a wise choice.
People also do comment that this technological asset can be nonsensical and a bane at times. This view is wholeheartedly supported by frequent posts of worthless and meaningless videos and documents, which unfortunate to say, take up the majority of the content at times. However, before we delve too much into the unfavourable aspects of youtube, let us focus instead on its helpfulness and benefits. You would then agree that reaping the advantages of this tool would and will be, a wise choice.
'The teenage years are the best years of one's life.' Would you agree with this view?
Personally, i would not be at an advantage in taking a stand on this issue, because i'm barely past the sixteenth year of a long journey - life. To a certain extent, this topic statement holds true; is it not in our teenage years that we have everything in our hands? Youth, vitality, health, you name it. The very tools which we use to shape our visions of bliss, happiness, and FUN.
But of course there is another take to this question. The teenage years are those long periods of conflicting self doubt and rebellious feelings; the urge to FIND the real you, and make yourself be heard over the overwhelming din - the constant nagging and voices of your so called 'superiors', or simply elders. The emergence of the new tide of EMO KIDS, clearly highlights this area of concern. Are they just lost souls, or are they actually just confused, troubled with this new term thrust right in their face, ADULTHOOD? Whatever the case, there is no denying that these EMO KIDS are the ones who will lead the world forward in time to come, shouldnt we stop and really pay them more attention and concern? Yes? No?
Finally, life is just a flash; to sit back (not lie back) and relax (not laze), not to ask yourself at your deathbed whether this was all just a dream. There is just once, LIVE it. i'm sure you would want to look back at the teenage years and say, ''Yes indeed, i have seen through this meaningful and enhancing period of life.''
But of course there is another take to this question. The teenage years are those long periods of conflicting self doubt and rebellious feelings; the urge to FIND the real you, and make yourself be heard over the overwhelming din - the constant nagging and voices of your so called 'superiors', or simply elders. The emergence of the new tide of EMO KIDS, clearly highlights this area of concern. Are they just lost souls, or are they actually just confused, troubled with this new term thrust right in their face, ADULTHOOD? Whatever the case, there is no denying that these EMO KIDS are the ones who will lead the world forward in time to come, shouldnt we stop and really pay them more attention and concern? Yes? No?
Finally, life is just a flash; to sit back (not lie back) and relax (not laze), not to ask yourself at your deathbed whether this was all just a dream. There is just once, LIVE it. i'm sure you would want to look back at the teenage years and say, ''Yes indeed, i have seen through this meaningful and enhancing period of life.''
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)